Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

47516

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Please accept my comments below for this proposal. I am a resident of Hamilton and concerned citizen. This proposal is problematic in the following ways: Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

47537

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
THE COMPANIES : Should establish required heights for ‘storage piles’ does not constitute proper noise abatement. The company should be required to install proper noise control walls/ barriers in locations where such controls are warranted. The storage piles : Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

47539

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
In regards to the Triple M ECA for more air and noise pollution proposal. As a resident living in the Parkview West community that has lived here for over 40 years, I have unfortunately lived through the many changes to the surrounding environment. I must say that many are not so positive. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

47541

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I understand levels of manganese coming from the facility are modelled at 91% of the Ministry of Environment limit. The modelled levels are substantially close to the limit warranting a call for actual monitoring to determine how high the levels actually are. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

47544

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
i object to any more construction at this site as the pouloution is all ready to high in this area i can't work outside as the air causes me to have coughing spells when i work in the gardens do to the red dust that comes off the plants and shrubs my house also gets covered and i have to have it wa Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

47551

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Levels of manganese coming from the facility are modelled at 91% of the Ministry of Environment limit. The modelled levels are very close to the actual limit, warranting a call for actual monitoring to determine how high these levels really are. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

47555

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
As homeowners within this community and already experiencing the noise and pollution from this industry we object strongly. The noise from large trucks within this small area is never ending, engine brakes being one of the loudest, the dust, health issues for us as well as our community. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

47560

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I have lived in this community since 1973.We hav had many environmental issues. Many changes and improvements have been made. But Triple M has put us into one of the most unbelievable stress possible for a resident . Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

47589

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Hello, Regarding the TRIPLE M Metals Scrap Yard – Provincial Air Permit Application, I question some of the modelled air emission results summarized in the companies report to the province. I request that the provincial Ministry of Environment require the company to actually Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

47604

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Triple M has been a huge problem in my neighbourhood for years and they are just getting worst. From blasts that shake the house to constant vibrations that vibrate our house. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

47605

Commentaire fait au nom

Environment Hamilton

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
*There is nothing in this comment that prevents MECP from posting it publicly in the final decision on this instrument amendment. Please post! Dear Madam/Sir Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

47606

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I feel the amendments applied for by Triple M Metal should be denied. The model used to calculate emissions appears to be flawed. The particulate matter cannot possibly be as low as indicated. I do not live in the adjacent neighborhood but in a neighborhood southwest of this area. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

47607

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I don't believe these amendments should be allowed to pass. Residents in the area are currently experiencing issues with noise pollution from the Triple M facility. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

47609

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I am writing to express my concern with Triple M Metal’s proposal. I am extremely concerned about the proposed 91% manganese emissions rate, and it’s potential neighbourhood neurotoxic health effects, not only in isolation but also taken cumulatively with other industry sources in the area. Lire davantage