Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

47537

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
THE COMPANIES : Should establish required heights for ‘storage piles’ does not constitute proper noise abatement. The company should be required to install proper noise control walls/ barriers in locations where such controls are warranted. The storage piles : Read more

Comment ID

47539

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
In regards to the Triple M ECA for more air and noise pollution proposal. As a resident living in the Parkview West community that has lived here for over 40 years, I have unfortunately lived through the many changes to the surrounding environment. I must say that many are not so positive. Read more

Comment ID

47541

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I understand levels of manganese coming from the facility are modelled at 91% of the Ministry of Environment limit. The modelled levels are substantially close to the limit warranting a call for actual monitoring to determine how high the levels actually are. Read more

Comment ID

47544

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
i object to any more construction at this site as the pouloution is all ready to high in this area i can't work outside as the air causes me to have coughing spells when i work in the gardens do to the red dust that comes off the plants and shrubs my house also gets covered and i have to have it wa Read more

Comment ID

47551

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Levels of manganese coming from the facility are modelled at 91% of the Ministry of Environment limit. The modelled levels are very close to the actual limit, warranting a call for actual monitoring to determine how high these levels really are. Read more

Comment ID

47555

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
As homeowners within this community and already experiencing the noise and pollution from this industry we object strongly. The noise from large trucks within this small area is never ending, engine brakes being one of the loudest, the dust, health issues for us as well as our community. Read more

Comment ID

47560

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I have lived in this community since 1973.We hav had many environmental issues. Many changes and improvements have been made. But Triple M has put us into one of the most unbelievable stress possible for a resident . Read more

Comment ID

47589

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Hello, Regarding the TRIPLE M Metals Scrap Yard – Provincial Air Permit Application, I question some of the modelled air emission results summarized in the companies report to the province. I request that the provincial Ministry of Environment require the company to actually Read more

Comment ID

47604

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Triple M has been a huge problem in my neighbourhood for years and they are just getting worst. From blasts that shake the house to constant vibrations that vibrate our house. Read more

Comment ID

47605

Commenting on behalf of

Environment Hamilton

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
*There is nothing in this comment that prevents MECP from posting it publicly in the final decision on this instrument amendment. Please post! Dear Madam/Sir Read more

Comment ID

47606

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I feel the amendments applied for by Triple M Metal should be denied. The model used to calculate emissions appears to be flawed. The particulate matter cannot possibly be as low as indicated. I do not live in the adjacent neighborhood but in a neighborhood southwest of this area. Read more

Comment ID

47607

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I don't believe these amendments should be allowed to pass. Residents in the area are currently experiencing issues with noise pollution from the Triple M facility. Read more

Comment ID

47609

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am writing to express my concern with Triple M Metal’s proposal. I am extremely concerned about the proposed 91% manganese emissions rate, and it’s potential neighbourhood neurotoxic health effects, not only in isolation but also taken cumulatively with other industry sources in the area. Read more