Comments

the length of time given for comments is not long enough, it should be at least 90 days , to allow people to become aware of the process and give them enough time to research and comment on it thanks

This license is part of the MOE's study for the Environmental Assessment. Any change to the license or its rehab plan would constitute a moving target for the studies to be done under the EA. This will then be problematic and interfere with another process in that ministry.

Thirty days to submit a proper response is not nearly enough time. This should be at least ninety days or more.

Please make sure the comment period for this proposal is at least 90 days to allow all concerned parties to have their say.

Please make sure the comment period for this proposal is at least 90 days to allow all concerned parties to have their say.

Please make sure the comment period for this proposal is at least 90 days to allow all concerned parties to have their say.

The Oxford Environmental Action Committee (OEAC) is requesting that the concurrent comment periods for the following EBR numbers be extended to a minimum of 90 days: 012-9852, 012-9850, 012-9849, 012-9848, 012-9845, 012-9843.

The Oxford Coalition for Social Justice asks that the concurrent comment periods for the following EBR numbers be extended to a minimum of 90 days: 012-9852, 012-9850, 012-9849, 012-9848, 012-9845, 012-9843.

Such an important decision to this request by Carmeuse requires far more time to review and comment than 30 days. Carmeuse' request to amalgamate licenses in an area already designated by their tenant (Walker) to build a mega landfill is an attempt to disrupt the EA process.

Mr. Darryl Hagman Aggregate Technical Specialist Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, Southern Region 615 John Street North, Aylmer, ON N5H 2S8 RE: EBR Numbers 012-9852, 012-9850, 012-9848, 012-9845, 012-9843, 012-9849 Dear Mr.

With a due date for comments on this and the other applications for license changes to rehab plans and amalgamation of licenses, I am glad to have received, as of 4:43 on Friday afternoon the documents which would allow us to prepare a detailed analysis and commentary on the several instruments.

In regards to the reply to my previous comment on these proposals it is not hard to see how these changes are linked to the proposed landfill project by Walker Environmental on said lands - Having seen documents relating to the changes I see less tree cover - a lovely area where the landfill can

This amalgamation of these quarry licenses will include a site that is over 100 years old. The ARA states that this is to be an interim use of the land and yet none of this site has ever been surrendered.

There are no Site Plan Notes and no Prescribed Licence Conditions or other conditions for the public and other stakeholders to consider and comment on. We have been given no information on what conditions may be changed at all in relation to Carmeuse Lime's current site plan obligations.

To: Darryl Hagman, Aggregate Technical Specialist, MNRF, Aylmer April, 2017 Dear Sir, The following are my comments on EBR numbers: 012-9852, 012-9850, 012-9849, 012-9848, 012-9845, 012-9843 as posted last month.

To: Darryl Hagman, Aggregate Technical Specialist, MNRF, Aylmer April, 2017 Dear Sir, The following are my comments on EBR numbers: 012-9852, 012-9850, 012-9849, 012-9848, 012-9845, 012-9843 as posted last month.

This proposed site amalgamation reopens conditions for the rehabilitation of this area.

This proposed site amalgamation reopens conditions for the rehabilitation of this area.

This proposed site amalgamation reopens conditions for the rehabilitation of this area.

This amalgamation of these quarry licenses will include a site that is over 100 years old. The ARA states that this is to be an interim use of the land and yet none of this site has ever been surrendered.