Comments

Why bother having a comment period - Does it really matter?

need more time to research what has been going on , and i feel that the company Carmeuse is pushing this forward too quickly, and not giving people enough time to become aware of what is going on thank you

I was hoping that the various postings related to this proposed and ill-advised amalgamation would collectively provide added information. They don't. A good decision can only be made based on much more specific information which I hope will soon be provided.

At least 90 days is needed in order to put together an adequate response.

Please make sure the comment period for this proposal is at least 90 days to  allow all concerned parties to have their say.

This amalgamation of these quarry licenses will include a site that is over 100 years old. The ARA states that this is to be an interim use of the land and yet none of this site has ever been surrendered.

To: Darryl Hagman, Aggregate Technical Specialist, Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, c/o MNRF, Aylmer Office April, 2017 Dear Mr.

This proposed site amalgamation reopens conditions for the rehabilitation of this area.

This proposed site amalgamation reopens conditions for the rehabilitation of this area.

This amalgamation of these quarry licenses will include a site that is over 100 years old. The ARA states that this is to be an interim use of the land and yet none of this site has ever been surrendered.

My concerns, and questions resulting form a series of email correspondence with Mr. Hagman, (see below) are two fold: Mr. Hagman’s contact information is: Darryl Hagman A/Aggregates Technical Specialist Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry Aylmer, ON 615 John St. N.

was unable, like many others in my community, to make this presentation at an earlier Council meeting, due to a technical failure of the EBR site, which frustrated many of us and prevented even the most basic access to the limited information on the EBR.

I have a series of questions that I hope can be answered before a decision can be made. - where is this new exit that is referred to in the notes but is not indicated anywhere else and hence we do not know its’ location , so how is it possible to make comment on it ???

IT IS IMPERATIVE THAT THE MNRF SEND A LETTER TO THE MOECC REQUESTING COMMENT BECAUSE : The MOECC is currently under the impression and I quote: “The Carmeuse Quarry is separate from the proposed Walker Landfill. The landfill is proposed in the non-active portion (already quarried) of the quarry.