Comments

View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.

Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.

Download comments

Search comments

Comment ID

59683

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
It is very concerning to me that this would be considered unless there had been an impact assessment made over a historical period and a predictive study to understand what the future impact would be, not on the water but the beach itself. Read more

Comment ID

59797

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am concerned about the impact of this proposal on the lake levels, the water quality of this important lake, the impact on the surrounding properties (settlement?) and the potential impact on the non renewable relic sand in the development area. Read more

Comment ID

59813

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am highly concerned about the proposal to dewater the sandy beach area for construction purposes. This would be so much water to pump out of the ground consistently. I can’t see how this is ecologically sound. Where would the water go?! Read more

Comment ID

59847

Commenting on behalf of

Port Elgin Beach Preservers

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Seven bore holes were mapped by Hydrogeology Consulting Services...the report was submitted on March 3, 2021, a year ago. The site location was changed on November 22, 2021. Attached is the most accurate comparison map completed on March 4, 2022. Read more

Comment ID

59853

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This plan is very environmentally risky and very ill advised. If you need to spend 3 YEARs removing ground water to make building on the site viable then it is a bad idea. As well, it will impact other buildings in the area and thus could incur unknown costs. Read more

Comment ID

59854

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
Are you aware that Port Elgin is home to a fish hatchery? And that many years ago the town used used oil to lay the dust on the beach where the dewatering will take place. What will this do to our fish if contaminated water is pumped into the lake at this site?

Comment ID

59856

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
This is a huge mistake. The Ministry of Natural Resources assisted in getting a stop work order for raking in Sauble Beach because of the plover a protected species. Port Elgin has advertised the plover nests on their beach .. How they protected the nests with a fence. Read more

Comment ID

59857

Commenting on behalf of

Individual

Comment status

Comment approved More about comment statuses
I am very concerned about the impact this will have on Lake Huron and any surrounding streams, including any possible under ground ones. There is in my opinion to much risk to the environment and surrounding dwellings that currently exist for this to be approved. Read more