Comments

Please open the time period to allow for a longer amount of time, ie 90 days at least for people to process the latest information Carmeuse has all the experts available to proceed with the plans they have, but the everyday ordinary average Ontarian does not have the time or the resources to rese

Read more

Rescind the license? Now that would be good. Meanwhile, let's give this some significant thought over the next three months. That would be more useful, transparent and responsive to the public.

Read more

Thirty days is not sufficient to put together a proper response, I would like to request that this is increased to 90 days. Thank You.

Read more

The 30 day comment period is unreasonable and unacceptable. This is a very complex proposal with serious environmental implications. The comment period must be extended to a minimum of 90 days.

Read more

Please make sure the comment period for this proposal is at least 90 days to allow all concerned parties to have their say.

Read more

Mr. Darryl Hagman Aggregate Technical Specialist Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, Southern Region 615 John Street North, Aylmer, ON N5H 2S8 RE: EBR Numbers 012-9852, 012-9850, 012-9848, 012-9845, 012-9843, 012-9849 Dear Mr.

Read more

This amalgamation of these quarry licenses will include a site that is over 100 years old. The ARA states that this is to be an interim use of the land and yet none of this site has ever been surrendered.

Read more

To: Darryl Hagman, Acting Aggregate Technical Specialist, Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry April, 2017 Re: Comments on EBR numbers: 012-9852, 012-9850, 012-9849, 012-9848, 012-9845, 012-9843 – A Lack of information related to Site Plan Notes and Licence Conditions I object to the ch Read more

This proposed site amalgamation reopens conditions for the rehabilitation of this area. When you look at how other quarries are rehabilitated like St Mary’s , Innerkip, Port Colborne, and compare it to how sparse the rehabilitation plans are for Carmeuse, we have an opportunity to require Read more

This amalgamation of these quarry licenses will include a site that is over 100 years old. The ARA states that this is to be an interim use of the land and yet none of this site has ever been surrendered.

Read more

My concerns, and questions resulting form a series of email correspondence with Mr. Hagman, (see below) are two fold: Mr. Hagman’s contact information is: Darryl Hagman A/Aggregates Technical Specialist Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry Aylmer, ON 615 John St. N.

Read more

According to an email from Darryl Hagman of the MNRF there have been no technical studies done on the Carmeuse sites because of “Grandfathering”. AS A CITIZEN, IF I WISH TO UPGRADE OR CHANGE MY HOUSE WIRING, I AM REQUIRED TO BRING EVERYTHING UP TO CODE. Read more

I was unable, like many others in my community, to make this presentation at an earlier Council meeting, due to a technical failure of the EBR site, which frustrated many of us and prevented even the most basic access to the limited information on the EBR.

Read more

I have a series of questions that I hope can be answered before a decision can be made. - where is this new exit that is referred to in the notes but is not indicated anywhere else and hence we do not know its’ location , so how is it possible to make comment on it ??? - Why was a letter not se Read more

IT IS IMPERATIVE THAT THE MNRF SEND A LETTER TO THE MOECC REQUESTING COMMENT BECAUSE : The MOECC is currently under the impression and I quote: “The Carmeuse Quarry is separate from the proposed Walker Landfill. Read more