This consultation was open from:
March 12, 2021
to April 26, 2021
Decision summary
An amended Environmental Compliance Approval with limited operational flexibility has been issued to Vale Canada Limited.
Location details
Site address
60 Mine Road
Lots 3, 4, and 5, Concession 3
Sudbury,
ON
Canada
Site location details
Garson Mine
Site location map
The location pin reflects the approximate area where environmental activity is taking place.
View this location on a map opens link in a new windowProponent(s)
Vale Canada Limited
337 Power Street
Copper Cliff,
ON
P0M 1N0
Canada
Decision details
An amended Environmental Compliance Approval with limited operational flexibility has been issued to all sources of air emissions for Vale Canada Limited for their Garson Mine located at 60 Mine Road in Sudbury, Ontario.
The company operates a nickel-copper mining facility, consisting of the following processes and support units:
- underground ore mining operations (trucking, drilling, blasting, crushing and material handling)
- mine ventilation raises
- ore and waste rock handling and stockpiling
- ore crushing
- backfilling operations (paste fill plant and backfill plant)
The maximum Facility Production Limit is up to 1,300,000 tonnes of nickel-copper sulphide ore per year.
Emissions to the air from this facility include:
- particulate matter
- calcium oxide
- ferric oxide
- titanium dioxide
- products of combustion including nitrogen oxides
The Environmental Compliance Approval with limited operational flexibility requires that the company demonstrates compliance on an ongoing basis with:
- Ontario Regulation 419/05
- applicable Ministry Guidelines for Air and Noise
- other performance requirements as specified in their conditions
It permits modifications such as process changes, de-bottlenecking or addition of new equipment subject to limits on operational flexibility that include a production limit for the facility to be specified on the Environmental Compliance Approval.
The limited operational flexibility conditions have a ten year expiry date. The company is required to make an application for amendment at that time to renew these conditions. Of specific public interest, one condition that is included on the Environmental Compliance Approval requires the company to make available, at all times, at the facility for inspection by interested members of the public, a table (Emission Summary Table) that documents the facility's compliance with Ontario Regulation 419/05.
Effects of consultation
Two comments from the public were received and indicated concerns in regards to:
- the health effects of noise
- low frequency noise from mechanical equipment and the usage of A-weighting
- the usage of higher noise limits in urban areas
- the suitability of NPC-300 noise limits when compared to the World Health Organization's noise limits
Ministry response:
The Acoustic Assessment Report submitted in support of the application indicated that the facility sound levels were found to be in compliance with MECP NPC-300 guidelines at all Points of Receptions.
Publication NPC-300 (Environmental Noise Guideline) is based on a worst-case hour of operation, which is more restrictive than a yearly average sound level (as used in some of the World Health Organization’s recommendations). Where a facility is not in compliance, a Noise Abatement Action Plan (NAAP) is required to be included in the Acoustic Assessment Report to outline proposed noise control measures and a timeline for their implementation.
The ministry conducts inspections and responds to complaints to ensure that the operation of industrial facilities meet approval requirements. If a facility requires noise control measures to achieve compliance, acoustic audits are required to verify post-implementation compliance.
In assessing applications for approvals, the ministry asks for information about noise in the range of 25 to 10,000 hertz. Sound in the frequency range below 20 Hertz is not typically audible to humans. Complaints of low frequency noise most often relate to indoor sound where a number of factors make it difficult to measure this noise. The province is actively monitoring emerging scientific studies and jurisdictional developments to inform decision makers how to address complaints related to indoor low frequency sound in specific situations. A-weighting (“dBA”) is used as a standard across the acoustic, noise control, and audiology communities as it reflects the sensitivity of the human ear at different frequencies.
Supporting materials
View materials in person
Some supporting materials may not be available online. If this is the case, you can request to view the materials in person.
Get in touch with the office listed below to find out if materials are available.
How to Appeal
This instrument decision can be appealed. You have 15 days from April 4, 2022 to begin the appeal process.
Carefully review the information below to learn more about the appeal process.
How to appealClick to Expand Accordion
For instrument decisions published on or after June 1, 2021, please refer to the updated instructions for information on how to appeal a decision.
Appeal process for decisions published before June 1, 2021
If you’re an Ontario resident, you can start the process to appeal this instrument decision.
First, you’ll need to seek leave (i.e. get permission) from the relevant appellate body to appeal the decision.
If the appellate body grants leave, the appeal itself will follow.
Seek leave to appeal
To seek leave to appeal, you need to do these three things:
- prepare your application
- provide notice to the minister
- mail your application to three parties
1. Prepare your application
You’ll need to prepare an application. You may wish to include the following things in your application:
- A document that includes:
- your name, phone number, fax number (if any), and/or email address
- the ERO number and ministry reference number (located on this page)
- a statement about whether you are a resident in Ontario
- your interest in the decision, and any facts you want taken into account in deciding whether you have an interest in the decision
- the parts of the instrument that you’re challenging
- whether the decision could result in significant harm to the environment
- the reason(s) why you believe that no reasonable person – having regard to the relevant law and to any government policies developed to guide decisions of that kind – could have made the decision
- the grounds (facts) you’ll be using to appeal
- the outcome you’d like to see
- A copy of the instrument (approval, permit, order) that you you are seeking leave to appeal. You’ll find this in the decision notice on the Environmental Registry
- Copies of all supporting documents, facts and evidence that you’ll be using to appeal
What is considered
The appeal body will consider the following two questions in deciding whether to grant you leave to appeal:
- is there is good reason to believe that no reasonable person, with respect to the relevant law and to any government policies developed to guide decisions of that kind, could have made the decision?
- could the decision you wish to appeal result in significant harm to the environment?
2. Provide your notice
You’ll need to provide notice to the Minister of the Environment, Conservation and Parks that you’re seeking leave to appeal.
In your notice, please include a brief description of the:
- decision that you wish to appeal
- grounds for granting leave to appeal
You can provide notice by email at minister.mecp@ontario.ca or by mail at:
College Park 5th Floor, 777 Bay St.
Toronto, ON
M7A 2J3
3. Mail your application
You’ll need to mail your application that you prepared in step #1 to each of these three parties:
- appellate body
- issuing authority (the ministry official who issued the instrument)
- proponent (the company or individual to whom the instrument was issued)
Vale Canada Limited
337 Power Street
Copper Cliff,
ON
P0M 1N0
Canada
Environmental Review Tribunal
Attention: The Secretary
655 Bay Street
Floor 15
Toronto, Ontario
M5G 1E5
(416) 212-6349
(866) 448-2248
OLT.Registrar@ontario.ca
Include the following:
This is not legal advice. Please refer to the Environmental Bill of Rights for exact legal requirements. Consult a lawyer if you need help with the appeal process.
Connect with us
Contact
Client Services and Permissions Branch
135 St Clair Ave West
1st Floor
Toronto,
ON
M4V 1P5
Canada
Original proposal
Proposal details
This proposal is for the renewal of the Limited Operational Flexibility for an Environmental Compliance Approval (air & noise) No. 4979-ADZR2K for Vale Canada Limited, a nickel-copper sulphide underground mine located in the City of Greater Sudbury, Ontario.
The emission sources from the manufacturing and associated processes that exhaust to the air include:
- crushing
- blasting
- material handling
- storage silos
- stockpiles
- storage tanks
- dust collectors
- welding operations
- any other equipment and ancillary and support processes and activities
Emissions to the air from this facility include:
- particulate matter
- calcium oxide
- ferric oxide
- titanium dioxide
- products of combustion including nitrogen oxides
The Environmental Compliance Approval with Limited Operational Flexibility (air), when issued, permits modifications to the facility subject to limits on operational flexibility that include a production limit for the facility to be specified on the Environmental Compliance Approval with Limited Operational Flexibility (air).
The limited operational flexibility conditions have an expiry date. The company will be required to make an application for amendment at that time to renew these conditions.
Supporting materials
View materials in person
Some supporting materials may not be available online. If this is the case, you can request to view the materials in person.
Get in touch with the office listed below to find out if materials are available.
Comment
Commenting is now closed.
This consultation was open from March 12, 2021
to April 26, 2021
Connect with us
Contact
Client Services and Permissions Branch
135 St Clair Ave West
1st Floor
Toronto,
ON
M4V 1P5
Canada
Comments received
Through the registry
2By email
0By mail
0