My concerns, and questions resulting form a series of email correspondence with Mr. Hagman, (see below) are two fold: Mr. Hagman’s contact information is: Darryl Hagman A/Aggregates Technical Specialist Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry Aylmer, ON 615 John St. N.
According to an email from Darryl Hagman of the MNRF there have been no technical studies done on the Carmeuse sites because of “Grandfathering”. AS A CITIZEN, IF I WISH TO UPGRADE OR CHANGE MY HOUSE WIRING, I AM REQUIRED TO BRING EVERYTHING UP TO CODE.
I was unable, like many others in my community, to make this presentation at an earlier Council meeting, due to a technical failure of the EBR site, which frustrated many of us and prevented even the most basic access to the limited information on the EBR.
Our not-for-profit environmental health organization is based in Oxford County and supports land use planning decisions that protect the environment and public health.
I have a series of questions that I hope can be answered before a decision can be made. - where is this new exit that is referred to in the notes but is not indicated anywhere else and hence we do not know its’ location , so how is it possible to make comment on it ???
IT IS IMPERATIVE THAT THE MNRF SEND A LETTER TO THE MOECC REQUESTING COMMENT BECAUSE : The MOECC is currently under the impression and I quote: “The Carmeuse Quarry is separate from the proposed Walker Landfill. The landfill is proposed in the non-active portion (already quarried) of the quarry.
TTLW is an Ingersoll based organization that supports environmental sustainability, including waste reduction and diversion, community gardens, community owned renewable energy, electric vehicles, and zero-footprint housing: all part of building healthy, resilient communities.
I am opposed to the site plan amendments and alterations to site licences proposed by Carmeuse Lime. There was a lack of information posted by the MNRF in relation to these proposals.
View the comments this notice received through the registry. You can either download them all or search and sort below.
Some comments will not be posted online. Learn more about the comment status and our comment and privacy policies.
Download comments
Well - Last day to comment…
Comment on
Carmeuse Lime (Canada) Limited - Changes to the site plan for a pit or quarry
Comment ID
28240
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Well - Last day to comment.
Read moreRelated actions
Well - Last day to comment…
Comment on
Carmeuse Lime (Canada) Limited - Changes to the site plan for a pit or quarry
Comment ID
28241
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Well - Last day to comment.
Read moreRelated actions
My concerns, and questions…
Comment on
Carmeuse Lime (Canada) Limited - Changes to the site plan for a pit or quarry
Comment ID
28242
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
My concerns, and questions resulting form a series of email correspondence with Mr. Hagman, (see below) are two fold: Mr. Hagman’s contact information is: Darryl Hagman A/Aggregates Technical Specialist Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry Aylmer, ON 615 John St. N.
Read moreRelated actions
According to an email from…
Comment on
Carmeuse Lime (Canada) Limited - Changes to the site plan for a pit or quarry
Comment ID
28243
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
According to an email from Darryl Hagman of the MNRF there have been no technical studies done on the Carmeuse sites because of “Grandfathering”. AS A CITIZEN, IF I WISH TO UPGRADE OR CHANGE MY HOUSE WIRING, I AM REQUIRED TO BRING EVERYTHING UP TO CODE.
Read moreRelated actions
I was unable, like many…
Comment on
Carmeuse Lime (Canada) Limited - Changes to the site plan for a pit or quarry
Comment ID
28244
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
I was unable, like many others in my community, to make this presentation at an earlier Council meeting, due to a technical failure of the EBR site, which frustrated many of us and prevented even the most basic access to the limited information on the EBR.
Read moreRelated actions
Our not-for-profit…
Comment on
Carmeuse Lime (Canada) Limited - Changes to the site plan for a pit or quarry
Comment ID
28245
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
Our not-for-profit environmental health organization is based in Oxford County and supports land use planning decisions that protect the environment and public health.
Read moreRelated actions
I have a series of questions…
Comment on
Carmeuse Lime (Canada) Limited - Changes to the site plan for a pit or quarry
Comment ID
28246
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
I have a series of questions that I hope can be answered before a decision can be made. - where is this new exit that is referred to in the notes but is not indicated anywhere else and hence we do not know its’ location , so how is it possible to make comment on it ???
Read moreRelated actions
IT IS IMPERATIVE THAT THE…
Comment on
Carmeuse Lime (Canada) Limited - Changes to the site plan for a pit or quarry
Comment ID
28247
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
IT IS IMPERATIVE THAT THE MNRF SEND A LETTER TO THE MOECC REQUESTING COMMENT BECAUSE : The MOECC is currently under the impression and I quote: “The Carmeuse Quarry is separate from the proposed Walker Landfill. The landfill is proposed in the non-active portion (already quarried) of the quarry.
Read moreRelated actions
TTLW is an Ingersoll based…
Comment on
Carmeuse Lime (Canada) Limited - Changes to the site plan for a pit or quarry
Comment ID
28248
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
TTLW is an Ingersoll based organization that supports environmental sustainability, including waste reduction and diversion, community gardens, community owned renewable energy, electric vehicles, and zero-footprint housing: all part of building healthy, resilient communities.
Read moreRelated actions
I am opposed to the site…
Comment on
Carmeuse Lime (Canada) Limited - Changes to the site plan for a pit or quarry
Comment ID
28249
Commenting on behalf of
Comment status
I am opposed to the site plan amendments and alterations to site licences proposed by Carmeuse Lime. There was a lack of information posted by the MNRF in relation to these proposals.
Read moreRelated actions