Commentaire
The proposal and licence application should be denied, and the governments reasons for doing so
clearly defined. It is the ultimate hypocrasy to allege to protect the environment and destroy it
at the same time. This proposal will destroy the environment in the area of the Queen Elizabeth
Park, and there is no list of species being protected by this proposal and how many will avoid
danger of extinction, endangerment or species at risk. It should be the objective to list how
species will be saved and what is the plan. What is the plan for each and every species? I would
like to have this explained to me and this government to be accountable to me and every other
citizen.
We need more people hired to save the environment, not destroy it. If this corporation has enough
money to destroy the environment through such a proposal then that corporation has enough money to
pay taxes for the government to hire more environmental activists. What is the plan to eliminate
unemployment through environmental hiring?
I wish to be a part of this decisionmaking process, when will the govenment return to me an
explaination of the decision and why? Why was I not notified regarding this proposal. In each and
every letter I send I ask to be included, but I receiive no notification. Can you explain to me
why I am not included, in a democracy where the government should be held accountable for every
thing that is decided and legislated. When will I get an answer?
Soumis le 16 mai 2019 11:51 AM
Commentaire sur
Giofam Investments Inc. - Issuance of a licence to remove over 20,000 tonnes of aggregate annually from a pit or a quarry
Numéro du REO
010-6875
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
29444
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire