Clublink Corporation ULC - Permit for activities to achieve an overall benefit to a species

Instrument type: Permit for activities to achieve an overall benefit to a species

ERO number
019-5569
Ministry reference number
ER-C-001-22
Notice type
Instrument
Act
Endangered Species Act , R.S.O. 2007
Posted by
Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks
Notice stage
Proposal Updated
Proposal posted
Comment period
August 25, 2022 - September 24, 2022 (30 days) Closed
Last updated

Update Announcement

This proposal notice has been updated on February 28, 2024 to advise the public that this file/application is still under active review. The ministry is reviewing the comments it has received to date. The original proposal date and comment period have not been altered.

This consultation was open from:

August 25, 2022
to September 24, 2022

Proposal summary

We are seeking input on a proposal for a permit to be issued to Clublink Corporation ULC for the development of a residential subdivision that may adversely impact Butternut, a species at risk in Ontario. The proposal considers avoidance options, proposed actions to minimize adverse effects and proposed overall benefit actions for the species.

Location details

Site address

7000 Campeau Drive
Kanata, ON
K2T 0A3
Canada

Site location map

The location pin reflects the approximate area where environmental activity is taking place.

View this location on a map opens link in a new window

Proponent(s)

Clublink Corporation ULC
15675 Dufferin Street
King City, ON
L7B 1K5
Canada

Proposal details

Clublink Corporation ULC has submitted an application for an overall benefit permit under clause 17(2)(c) of the Endangered Species Act, 2007 (ESA) for impacts to Butternut to construct a new subdivision, including approximately 1,544 residential units, in Kanata, Ontario.

The proposal may adversely impact:

  • Butternut individuals
  • approximately 5.79 hectares of Butternut habitat

Protecting species under the Endangered Species Act

The Ontario government is committed to protecting species at risk and providing strong environmental oversight while working to support development opportunities in the province.

Ontario provides protections for species at risk and their habitats under the Endangered Species Act, 2007 (ESA). Sections 9 and 10 of the ESA provide protection for individual members of a species and their habitat if that species is listed on the Species at Risk in Ontario List as either:

  • extirpated
  • endangered
  • threatened

Butternut is listed on the Species at Risk in Ontario List as endangered; therefore, it is protected.

Under clause 17(2)(c) of the ESA, the Minister may issue a permit authorizing a person to engage in an activity that would otherwise be prohibited by sections 9 or 10 of the ESA if the minister believes that:

  • an overall benefit to the species will be achieved within a reasonable time through the conditions of the permit
  • reasonable alternatives have been considered, including alternatives that would not negatively affect the species, and the best alternative has been adopted
  • reasonable steps to minimize negative effects on individual members of the species are required by conditions of the permit

Providing an overall benefit to a protected species under the ESA involves improving circumstances for the species in Ontario. Overall benefit is:

  • more than “no net loss” or an exchange of “like for like”
  • grounded in the protection and recovery of the species at risk
  • must include more than mitigation measures or “replacing” what is lost

Actions to achieve an overall benefit to species

Clublink Corporation ULC is working to identify proposed actions that would achieve an overall benefit to Butternut. These may involve:

  • archiving 4 Butternut and collecting 50 scions from each tree for a total of 200 scions to be grafted onto recipient Black Walnut trees
  • working with a local stewardship program to produce and distribute 394 Butternut seedlings to be planted by landowners across Eastern Ontario

The planting of Butternut seedlings in many small populations spread out over a large geographic area is anticipated to:

  • yield long term conservation gains compared to a high-density planting in a single location
  • help improve the species success and chances of natural reproduction, distribution and genetic diversity

Reasonable alternatives being considered

Clublink Corporation ULC is considering alternatives, including alternatives that would not adversely affect Butternut and its habitat. These may include:

  • Alternative 1 - proceed with the proposed project development
  • Alternative 2 - reduce the size of the Woodland Park within the proposed project development
  • Alternative 3 - avoid all impacts to Butternut and its habitat

Clublink Corporation ULC has concluded that the best alternative is Alternative 1. This alternative:

  • will allow the project development to proceed
  • is considered economically viable and technically feasible
  • strikes a balance between meeting the servicing and development needs of the subdivision, while preserving/enhancing key habitat features and functions for Butternut

Actions to minimize adverse effects on the species

Clublink Corporation ULC is seeking ways to minimize adverse effects on Butternut and its habitat. These may include:

  • conducting contractor awareness training before starting work on the site
  • marking Butternut trees to be retained to avoid accidentally harming or killing individuals during project activities
  • marking the edge of the tree clearing area to ensure only designated trees are removed
  • ensuring that the Critical Root Zone of retained Butternut trees is fully protected
  • ensuring that exhaust fumes from all equipment are directed away from tree canopy
  • providing homeowner awareness and education packages to educate homeowners on the presence of the species

Other information

The Province has published a government response statement (GRS) under subsection 12.1 of the Endangered Species Act, 2007 (ESA) with respect to Butternut. The GRS will be considered before a decision to issue an overall benefit permit.

Posting this proposal on the Environmental Registry of Ontario does not imply that the Minister will issue a permit. A permit may only be issued where the legal requirements set out in clause 17(2)(c) of the ESA have been satisfied.

Supporting materials

View materials in person

Some supporting materials may not be available online. If this is the case, you can request to view the materials in person.

Get in touch with the office listed below to find out if materials are available.

Permissions Section
Address

40 St. Clair Ave. West
14th Floor
Toronto, ON
M4V 1M2
Canada

Office phone number

Comment

Commenting is now closed.

The comment period was from August 25, 2022
to September 24, 2022

Connect with us

Contact

April Mitchell

Phone number
Office
Species at Risk Branch - Land and Water Division
Address

435 James St. South
Suite 114
Thunder Bay, ON
P7E 6T1
Canada

Sign up for notifications

We will send you email notifications with any updates related to this consultation. You can change your notification preferences anytime by visiting settings in your profile page.

Follow this notice