There is no requirement to post this notice on the Environmental Registry of Ontario, but we wanted to hear your thoughts. Thank you for your feedback.
This consultation was open from:
October 19, 2021
to December 3, 2021
Decision summary
Ontario has expanded the definition of “hazard” in the Animal Health Act, 2009 (AHA) through a regulation.
Ontario is updating the appendices in O. Reg. 277/12 containing lists of Immediately Notifiable Hazards and Periodically Notifiable Hazards.
Decision details
Ontario has made regulatory changes under the Animal Health Act, 2009 to enhance preparedness for an animal health related event.
New Regulation – Prescribed Hazards
The regulation prescribes that, for the purposes of clause (c) of the definition of “hazard” in section 2 of the Animal Health Act, 2009 (AHA), any surplus of livestock or poultry in the Province is prescribed as a hazard if the surplus is caused by restrictions on the movement of the livestock, poultry or related animal products within Ontario or across interprovincial or international borders; and the restrictions were imposed due to concerns about a disease or a biological, chemical, physical or radiological agent or factor.
As per the existing definition in the AHA, the definition needs to be read so that the surplus is considered a “hazard” if, in the absence of control of the surplus, it must adversely affect or be likely to adversely affect the health of any animal or likely to cause, directly or indirectly, significant harm to human health.
This regulation permits the authorities in the AHA that allow for the prevention, detection and response to a “hazard” to be used, in appropriate circumstances and in accordance with the relevant sections in the AHA, to address a provincial surplus of livestock or poultry (due, for example, to a significant disruption that has occurred within a supply chain because of border-related measures adopted in response to a serious animal disease).
The potential application of the AHA in these circumstances would help position Ontario to be better prepared to respond to animal health related emergencies if they arise.
Amended Regulation – Updates to Appendices in O. Reg. 277/12 – Notifiable Hazards
The appendices to O. Reg. 277/12 that list the immediately notifiable hazards and periodically notifiable hazards, such as animal diseases, that must be reported to the Chief Veterinarian for Ontario have been updated. The original proposal included the following changes:
- adding new hazards to the appendices that have emerged as concerns
- adding some hazards to the appendices that are relevant to the commercial aquaculture sector
- moving some hazards between the two Appendices (i.e., from Appendix A to B, vice-versa) to more accurately align with level of risk
- updating the technical names and descriptions for some immediately notifiable and periodically notifiable hazards
- removing some hazards from Appendix B (Periodically Notifiable) reflecting new information within the veterinary and animal health community
Stakeholder feedback during the consultation was consistent with the above approach and included specific hazard recommendations that are reflected in the final regulation.
The amendments will come into effect on February 1, 2023
Effects of consultation
During the 45-day consultation period, a total of 9 comments were received. Most of the feedback from the consultation was supportive of the prescribed hazard proposal.
Some changes to the original proposal with respect to updating the appendices in O. Reg. 277/12 were made based on stakeholder input, providing reassurance that the ministry is keeping its regulations in line with current disease risks.
Supporting materials
View materials in person
Some supporting materials may not be available online. If this is the case, you can request to view the materials in person.
Get in touch with the office listed below to find out if materials are available.
1 Stone Road West
2nd Floor
Guelph,
ON
N1G 4Y2
Canada
Connect with us
Contact
Michael Richardson
1 Stone Road West
2nd Floor
Guelph,
ON
N1G 4Y2
Canada
Original proposal
Why consultation isn't required
The Animal Health Act, 2009 (AHA) is not prescribed in O. Reg. 73/94. The regulatory proposals are unlikely to have a significant impact on the environment if made and filed as proposed. However, the ministry is posting a notice on the ERO because previous regulatory proposals under the AHA have also been posted on the ERO for consultation. Ontario’s policy approach to animal health recognizes the inherent link between the health of farmed animals, the health of animals that are part of the natural environment in Ontario, and the health of people.
Proposal details
Ontario recognizes the important relationship among animal health, human health, food safety and the economic well-being of the livestock and poultry sector. The Animal Health Act, 2009 (AHA) provides OMAFRA with important tools to detect and respond to findings of significant animal health hazards or animal-related threats to human health in Ontario.
- Prescribe that a provincial surplus of livestock or poultry due to a border-related disruption to the market would be a “hazard”.
OMAFRA is proposing a new regulation. If approved, the regulation would prescribe that, in addition to what is set out in the definition of “hazard” in section 2 of the AHA, a “hazard” would also mean a surplus of livestock or poultry in the province that results from restrictions associated with the movement of livestock or poultry across interprovincial or international borders. As per section 2 of the AHA, the definition would also provide that, in the absence of management of the surplus, it must adversely affect or be likely to adversely affect the health of any animal or be likely to cause, directly or indirectly, significant harm to human health.
This regulation, if approved, would permit the authorities in the AHA that allow for the prevention, detection and response to a “hazard” to be used, in appropriate circumstances and in accordance with the relevant sections in the AHA, to address a provincial surplus of livestock or poultry (due, for example, to a significant disruption that has occurred within a supply chain because of border-related measures).
The potential application of the AHA in these circumstances would help position Ontario to be better prepared to respond to animal health related emergencies if they arise. - Updating the appendices listing notifiable hazards in O. Reg. 277/12
Mandatory reporting requirements allow the Chief Veterinarian for Ontario (CVO) to gather information about emerging animal and public health hazards to assess their risks and to determine whether further technical guidance or regulatory action is needed. Updating the Appendices would reflect the current status of significant hazards and would provide government and industry with information in a timely manner, placing the province in a better position to safeguard animal health, human health and the food supply.
All Immediately Notifiable Hazards are reported to the CVO by laboratories as soon as the operator of the laboratory has reason to believe that there is a reasonable probability that the hazard is present in any sample or specimen. In some cases, these hazards are reported by veterinarians. Periodically Notifiable Hazards are reported by laboratories to the CVO on an annual basis.
Since O. Reg. 277/12 came into force on January 1, 2013, animal health risks in Ontario have evolved significantly. New hazards have emerged, including diseases such as porcine epidemic diarrhea virus, the prevalence of hazards has changed, industry awareness and interest has increased in certain hazards and other industries have expanded in Ontario (e.g., aquaculture).
To allow the province to respond more quickly and effectively and to reduce the impact on animal and/or human health, OMAFRA is proposing to:
- Update the current Appendices by adding new hazards to the Appendices
- Move some hazards that are emerging as concerns from Appendix B (Periodically Notifiable) to Appendix A (Immediately Notifiable) and vice versa where the risk has lessened.
Analysis of Regulatory Impact
It is not expected that the proposed regulation with respect to the definition of “hazard” would result in any administrative costs for business. It is also anticipated that the proposed changes to O. Reg. 277/12 would likewise not increase costs for livestock or poultry producers. Animal health laboratories may see some minor costs to support information technology adjustments to update the database interface to include the flagging and reporting of the specific hazards that are to be added to the lists of notifiable hazards in O. Reg. 277/12 (i.e., a one-time cost).
Supporting materials
View materials in person
Some supporting materials may not be available online. If this is the case, you can request to view the materials in person.
Get in touch with the office listed below to find out if materials are available.
1 Stone Road West
Ontario Government Building, 2nd floor, Southwest
Guelph,
ON
N1G 4Y2
Canada
Comment
Commenting is now closed.
This consultation was open from October 19, 2021
to December 3, 2021
Connect with us
Contact
Michael Richardson
1 Stone Road West
Ontario Government Building, 2nd floor, Southwest
Guelph,
ON
N1G 4Y2
Canada
Comments received
Through the registry
2By email
7By mail
0