Maple Creek Developments Inc. - Permit for activities to achieve an overall benefit to a species

Instrument type: Permit for activities to achieve an overall benefit to a species

ERO number
019-3160
Ministry reference number
ER-C-002-20
Notice type
Instrument
Act
Endangered Species Act , R.S.O. 2007
Posted by
Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks
Notice stage
Decision
Decision posted
Comment period
March 19, 2021 - April 18, 2021 (30 days) Closed
Last updated

This consultation was open from:
March 19, 2021
to April 18, 2021

Decision summary

The Minister has issued an overall benefit permit under the Endangered Species Act, 2007 (ESA) to Maple Creek Developments Inc. for construction activities that may impact Blanding’s Turtle, Butternut and their habitat. The permit includes actions to benefit the species and minimize adverse effects and requires monitoring and reporting.

Location details

Site location details

Part of Lots 1 and 2, Concession A, Township of North Gower, Ottawa.

Site location map

The location pin reflects the approximate area where environmental activity is taking place.

View this location on a map opens link in a new window

Proponent(s)

Maple Creek Developments Inc.
P.O. Box 477
Ottawa, ON
K4M 1A5
Canada

Decision details

On August 20, 2021, the Minister of the Environment, Conservation and Parks issued an overall benefit permit to Maple Creek Developments Inc. with respect to Blanding’s Turtle and Butternut, which are species at risk. The permit authorizes Maple Creek Developments Inc. to adversely impact Blanding’s Turtle and Butternut so they can construct a subdivision in Manotick, Ontario.

The permit authorizes Maple Creek Developments Inc. to adversely impact:

  • Blanding’s Turtle and up to 4.8 hectares of habitat that supports movement corridors between wetlands and nesting habitat (Category 3 Blanding’s Turtle habitat)
  • up to 12 Category 2 Butternut trees, up to 14 Category 2 Butternut trees, and 1 Category 3 Butternut tree and up to 5.99 hectares of Butternut habitat

Protecting species under the Endangered Species Act

Our government is committed to protecting species at risk and providing strong environmental oversight, while working to support development opportunities in the province.

Businesses, municipalities and other proponents are expected to take steps to ensure their projects avoid any adverse impacts on species at risk or their habitats.

However, where avoidance is not possible, the Endangered Species Act, 2007 gives the Minister the discretion to authorize activities if certain conditions can be met.

The permit includes conditions that require the proponent to undertake measures that will:

  • minimize adverse effects to Blanding’s Turtle and Butternut
  • achieve an overall benefit to Blanding’s Turtle and Butternut within a reasonable time

Actions to minimize adverse effects to species

The permit requires Maple Creek Developments Inc. to carry out actions to minimize adverse effects on Blanding’s Turtle, including:

  • conducting contractor awareness training before starting work on the site
  • installing temporary and permanent exclusion fencing to prevent turtles from accessing the development site during and after construction, respectively
  • minimizing the construction footprint where possible
  • conducting sweeps before the start of each workday
  • adhering to a species at risk encounter protocol
  • engaging a Qualified Professional to oversee and undertake important aspects of the project
  • monitoring mitigation measures to ensure they are effective

The permit requires Maple Creek Developments Inc. to carry out actions to minimize adverse effects on Butternut, including:

  • conducting contractor awareness training before starting work on the site
  • protecting trees by fencing those to be protected as well as fencing along site peripheries
  • engaging a Qualified Professional to oversee and undertake important aspects of the project
  • minimizing the construction footprint where possible
  • monitoring mitigation measures to ensure they are effective

Actions to achieve an overall benefit to species

The permit requires Maple Creek Developments Inc. to carry out actions to achieve an overall benefit for Blanding’s Turtle within a reasonable timeframe. This includes enhancing approximately 225 square metres along the Mud Creek Corridor including:

  • creating an embayment area
  • creating two offline pools
  • placing six sunning logs
  • creating two artificial nesting sites
  • planting a diverse selection of native aquatic wetland vegetation
  • removing invasive plants (e.g. flowering-rush)

The permit requires Maple Creek Developments Inc. to carry out actions to achieve an overall benefit for Butternut within a reasonable timeframe. This includes:

  • archiving (i.e. collect healthy material to produce seeds, seedlings and tree grafts) one Butternut tree through collecting and grafting a minimum of 50 Butternut scions (a scion is a small portion of a tree with buds used for grafting)
  • planting, tending and monitoring a minimum of 64 Butternut seedlings and replacement plantings as needed

Other information

Alternatives to the proposed project were considered by the proponent, including:

  • not proceeding with the site development
  • proceeding with the site development but reducing site servicing and grading requirements
  • proceeding with site development but reducing the size of development phases
  • proceeding with site development of 61 village lots

The proponent has concluded that the best alternative involves proceeding with site development of 61 village lots, retaining healthy Butternuts along site peripheries and in the rear of the lots wherever possible while avoiding all Category 2 Blanding’s Turtle habitat.

This preferred alternative strikes a balance between achieving the objective of constructing a new subdivision and limiting the adverse effects to Butternut and Blanding's Turtle.

A government response statement (GRS) for Blanding’s Turtle was published in September 2020 and is available at: https://www.ontario.ca/page/blandings-turtle-government-response-statement. Consideration was given to the GRS and proposed permit conditions align with the objectives outlined in the GRS, including improving habitat.

A GRS for Butternut was published in March 2014 and is available at: https://www.ontario.ca/page/butternut-government-response-statement. Consideration was given to the GRS and proposed permit conditions align with the objectives outlined in the GRS, including collecting and archiving genetic material from Butternut trees that may contribute to the recovery of the species.

Comments received

Through the registry

0

By email

0

By mail

0
View comments submitted through the registry

Effects of consultation

No comments were received in response to the Environmental Registry posting.

Supporting materials

View materials in person

Some supporting materials may not be available online. If this is the case, you can request to view the materials in person.

Get in touch with the office listed below to find out if materials are available.

Permissions and Compliance Species at Risk Branch
Address

40 St. Clair Avenue West
14th Floor
Toronto, ON
M4V 1M2
Canada

Office phone number

How to Appeal

Appeals are not allowed

This instrument type cannot be appealed. Learn more about our consultation process.

Connect with us

Contact

Sign up for notifications

We will send you email notifications with any updates related to this consultation. You can change your notification preferences anytime by visiting settings in your profile page.

Follow this notice

Original proposal

ERO number
019-3160
Ministry reference number
ER-C-002-20
Notice type
Instrument
Act
Endangered Species Act , R.S.O. 2007
Posted by
Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks
Proposal posted

Comment period

March 19, 2021 - April 18, 2021 (30 days)

Proposal details

Maple Creek Developments Inc. has submitted a proposal for an overall benefit permit under clause 17(2)(c) of the Endangered Species Act, 2007 (ESA). The proposal is to construct a new subdivision in Manotick, Ottawa.

The proposal may adversely affect Butternut, Blanding’s Turtle and their respective habitats.

Protecting species under the Endangered Species Act

Sections 9 and 10 of the ESA provide protection for individual members of a species and their habitat if that species is listed on the Species at Risk in Ontario List as either:

  • extirpated
  • endangered
  • threatened

Butternut is listed as endangered and Blanding’s Turtle as threatened, therefore both are protected.

Under clause 17(2)(c) of the ESA, the minister may issue a permit authorizing a person to engage in an activity that would otherwise be prohibited by sections 9 or 10 of the ESA if the minister believes that:

  • an overall benefit to the species will be achieved within a reasonable timeframe through the conditions of the permit
  • reasonable alternatives have been considered, including alternatives that would not negatively affect the species, and the best alternative has been adopted
  • reasonable steps to minimize negative effects on individual members of the species are required by conditions of the permit

Providing an overall benefit to a protected species under the ESA involves improving circumstances for the species in Ontario. Overall benefit is:

  • more than “no net loss” or an exchange of “like for like”
  • grounded in the protection and recovery of the species at risk
  • must include more than mitigation measures or “replacing” what is lost

Actions to achieve an overall benefit to species

Maple Creek Developments Inc. is working to identify proposed actions that would achieve an overall benefit to Butternut. These may involve:

  • archiving and collecting scions (50) from one suitable Butternut
  • planting 64 Butternut seedlings off-site

Maple Creek Developments Inc. is working to identify proposed actions that would achieve an overall benefit to Blanding’s Turtle. These may involve:

  • Enhancing approximately 225 m2 habitat along the Mud Creek corridor including:
    • placing six sunning logs
    • creating an embayment area to increase turtle habitat diversity
    • placing two nesting habitat areas
    • creating two pool habitats
    • planting a diversity of native aquatic wetland vegetation
    • removal of the invasive flowering-rush
  • monitoring the Overall Benefit actions undertaken to ensure they are effective.

Reasonable alternatives being considered

Maple Creek Developments Inc. is considering alternatives, including alternatives that would not adversely affect Butternut and Blanding’s Turtle. These may include:

  • not proceeding with the site development
  • proceeding with the site development but reducing site servicing and grading requirements
  • proceeding with site development but reducing the size of development phases
  • proceeding with site development of 61 village lots

The proponent has concluded that the best alternative involves proceeding with site development of 61 village lots, retaining healthy Butternuts along site peripheries and in the rear of the lots wherever possible while avoiding all Category 2 Blanding’s Turtle habitat. 

This preferred alternative strikes a balance between achieving the project's objective of constructing a new subdivision and limiting the adverse effects to Butternut and Blanding’s Turtle.

Actions to minimize adverse effects on the species

Potential approaches to minimize adverse effects on Butternut may include:

  • conducting contractor awareness training prior to undertaking activities on the site
  • fencing of trees to be protected as well as fencing along site peripheries to protect off-site trees
  • engaging a Qualified Professional to oversee and undertake important aspects of the project
  • minimizing the construction footprint where possible
  • monitoring mitigation measures to ensure they are effective

Potential approaches to minimize adverse effects on Blanding’s Turtle may include:

  • conducting contractor awareness training prior to undertaking activities on the site
  • installing temporary and permanent exclusion fencing to prevent turtles from accessing the development site during and after construction, respectively
  • minimizing the construction footprint where possible
  • conducting sweeps prior to the start of each work day
  • adhering to a species at risk encounter protocol
  • engaging a Qualified Professional to oversee and undertake important aspects of the project
  • monitoring mitigation measures to ensure they are effective

Other information

A government response statement to the recovery strategy for both Butternut and Blanding’s Turtle has been published. It will be considered in:

  • determining whether or not to approve the permit
  • developing any future permit conditions

Posting this proposal on the Environmental Registry does not imply that we will issue a permit. A permit may only be issued where the legal requirements set out in clause 17(2)(c) of the ESA have been satisfied.

Supporting materials

View materials in person

Some supporting materials may not be available online. If this is the case, you can request to view the materials in person.

Get in touch with the office listed below to find out if materials are available.

Comment

Commenting is now closed.

This consultation was open from March 19, 2021
to April 18, 2021

Connect with us

Contact