Update Announcement
On June 29, 2018, the Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks assumed responsibility for the Endangered Species Act, 2007. The act was formerly the responsibility of the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry.
This consultation was open from:
October 12, 2018
to November 11, 2018
Decision summary
We issued a permit amendment to KSDA Development Corporation to correctly identify a Butternut Tree Number in their permit, and to update the authorization for this particular Butternut Tree to enable KSDA Development Corporation to finish their proposed works.
Location details
Site location details
Lot 17, Concession 2, Geographic township of McNab, Renfrew County
Township of McNab-Braeside
South side of Madawaska River, East of Building Supply Road and Southeast of the Burnstown Bridge
Site location map
The location pin reflects the approximate area where environmental activity is taking place.
View this location on a map opens link in a new windowProponent(s)
KDSA Development Corporation
228 Bradford Street
Ottawa,
ON
K2B 5Z6
Canada
Decision details
On February 05, 2019 a permit amendment was issued to KSDA Development to correctly identify the Butternut Tree Number, and to update the authorization for this tree, to enable the Corporation to finish their proposed works.
Subclause 17(7)(a)(i) of the Endangered Species Act, 2007 provides the authority for the minister to amend a permit issued under 17(2)(c) of the Act with the consent of the permit holder. However, the minister must be of the opinion that he or she would have been authorized to issue the permit under clause 17(2)(c) in its amended form. The permit as amended would continue to meet the legal tests as described below for Butternut.
Overall benefit to Butternut will be achieved within a reasonable time through requirements imposed by conditions of the permit including:
- archive one (1) Butternut tree by collecting at least 50 Butternut Scions from one archivable Butternut tree, of which at least 30 will be grafted, tended and planted in a protected area
The minister is of the opinion that reasonable alternatives have been considered, including alternatives that would not adversely affect the species including:
- conducting the activity in an alternate location
- using alternative methods, equipment, designs, etc. for carrying out the proposed activity
- the best alternative, which was adopted, included redesigning the access plans to maximize retention of healthy butternuts
The best alternative, which has been adopted, includes redesigning the access plans to maximize retention of healthy Butternuts.
The minister is of the opinion that reasonable steps to minimize adverse effects on individual members of the species are required by conditions of the permit, as amended, including:
- minimizing the number of Butternut trees on site that are removed
- installing protective fencing around retainable Butternut
- retaining a qualified professional to carry out conditions of the permit
Supporting materials
View materials in person
Some supporting materials may not be available online. If this is the case, you can request to view the materials in person.
Get in touch with the office listed below to find out if materials are available.
40 St. Clair Avenue West
14th Floor
Toronto,
ON
M4V 1M2
Canada
How to Appeal
Appeals are not allowed
This instrument type cannot be appealed. Learn more about our consultation process.
Connect with us
Contact
Mallory Myschowoda
300 Water Street
4th Floor, South tower
Peterborough,
ON
K9J 3C7
Canada
Original proposal
Proposal details
Description of instrument:
On June 17, 2015, a permit was issued to KSDA Development Corporation (the “Proponent ”) under clause 17(2)(c) of the Endangered Species Act, 2007, to harm five (5) Category 2 and one (1) Category 3 Butternut trees, as well as and damage their habitat in order to Butternut in order to facilitate road advancement in support of a subdivision development in the geographic township of McNab, Renfrew County.
On June 08, 2018, the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry was notified that the Permit misidentified a Butternut with an incorrect Tree Number in the Permit, as Butternut Tree Number 32 was labelled as Tree Number 23 in the Permit. In addition, the Proponent requested that the authorization to this tree be changed from “harmed” to “kill” since the tree intersects with the proposed road development. As a result, the Proponent wishes to update the Permit to correctly identify Butternut Tree Number 32, as well as the authorization for this tree, in order to finish their proposed works.
Other information:
Subclause 17(7)(a)(i) of the Endangered Species Act provides the authority for the Minister to amend a permit issued under 17(2)(c) of the Endangered Species Act with the consent of the permit holder. However, the Minister must be of the opinion that he or she would have been authorized to issue the permit under clause 17(2)(c) in its amended form. The permit as amended would continue to meet the legal tests as described below for Butternut.
Test 1 - Overall benefit to the species will be achieved within a reasonable time through requirements imposed by the following conditions of the amended permit:
- archive 1 Butternut that demonstrates potential resistance to Butternut canker
Test 2 - The Minister is of the opinion that reasonable alternatives have been considered, including alternatives that would not adversely affect the species including:
- conducting the activity in an alternate location
- using alternative methods, equipment, designs, etc. for carrying out the proposed activity
The best alternative, which was adopted, included redesigning the access plans to maximize retention of healthy Butternuts.
Test 3 - The Minister is of the opinion that reasonable steps to minimize adverse effects on individual members of the species are required by conditions of the permit, as amended, including:
- minimizing the number of trees on site that are removed
- protect Butternut identified as Tree Numbers 8, 13, 27, 33 and Tree Number 25 from adjacent site preparation with fencing to restrict construction activity
- retaining a qualified professional to carry out conditions of the permit
A Government Response Statement published under ss. 11(8) of the Endangered Species Act exists for Butternut, and was considered when reviewing the proposed permit amendment.
Supporting materials
View materials in person
Some supporting materials may not be available online. If this is the case, you can request to view the materials in person.
Get in touch with the office listed below to find out if materials are available.
31 Riverside Drive
Pembroke,
ON
K8A 8R6
Canada
Comment
Commenting is now closed.
This consultation was open from October 12, 2018
to November 11, 2018
Connect with us
Contact
Darwin Rosien
31 Riverside Drive
Pembroke,
ON
K8A 8R6
Canada
Comments received
Through the registry
0By email
0By mail
0