Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

91312

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Do not under any circumstances mess with our agricultural land. There is no need for housing development on agricultural land. What use is more housing if people can’t eat. Seriously 😏 BACK OFF!

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

91313

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
my concern is the subdivisions that are already being built around the small rural hamlets , the infrastructure is not capable of handling the commute to cities for employment as it is . Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

91314

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I am echoing the comments from the OFA (Ontario Federation of Agriculture) with my own personal commentary. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

91316

Commentaire fait au nom

Niagara Falls Nature Club

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
ERO number 019-6813 - Review of proposed policies adapted from A Place to Grow and Provincial Policy Statement to form a new provincial planning policy instrument. Thank you for removing the changes which would have allowed lot severances on prime agricultural land. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

91317

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I strongly support the comments and recommendations submitted by the Prince Edward County Field Naturalists.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

91319

Commentaire fait au nom

Community Heritage Ontario (CHO)

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Please find attached the comments provided by Community Heritage Ontario (CHO) Board of Directors. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

91321

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
SUPPORT for the Proposed Planning Statement (section 4.3) We are owners of a small 50 acre farm in the Oro portion of Oro-Medonte Township and were happy about the original Proposed Planning Statement that provided the opportunity for us to potentially sever off three lots (section 4.3). Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

91322

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Countryside Line has been a hard boundary that protects Waterloo Region’s groundwater, farmland, and natural areas for generations to come. Development here will not help create more housing, nor will it help with affordability. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

91323

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I am fully supportive of government action to accelerate the construction of more housing, particularly more affordable housing. But I am fully opposed to any development beyond existing urban boundaries. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

91326

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I would like to preserve the existing Greenbelt and farmland in Ontario to meet our needs for coming generations. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

91327

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Mt Ford, Please continue to move through the ability for farmers to sever three lots off their land. This is a good policy and must be passed. It is one of the ways that will allow farms to continue to exist. My family and friends support this policy.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

91328

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I have been in Residential construction in my own business for 17 years and employ 30 employees in the industry. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

91329

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I believe this Bill is acting in a short sighted manner and is unable to alleviate the cost of living significantly relative to the harm this will do to the environmental and farming requirements our province needs. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

91330

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
More Suburban Sprawl is not the answer. Destroying farmland is not the answer. Destroying green space is not the answer. We need more medium density housing. We need to take back the unused and underused housing already built. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

91331

Commentaire fait au nom

City of Cambridge

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Please see attached letter from the City of Cambridge Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

91332

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Still waiting on the Natural Heritage section to be completed in early June. Clearly this was not a priority for this government, as it seems the updated PPS is being rushed through. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

91333

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I completely disagree with this bill. Farmland should be protected! We cannot afford to be short sighted, protecting viable farmland should trump development. The proposed development will not help relieve the housing crisis. As a long time renter, this will not enable me to afford a new build. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

91334

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I wish to express my objection to making ANY changes to the existing Provincial Policy Statement. The current statement was developed with very carefully researched and developed policy that put the protection of people and the environment a top priority. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

91335

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Considering that the economy is in shambles along with the environment, jeopardizing our natural resources and food security for facilitating the interests of landowners and developers doesn't seem like a sensible policy direction.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

91336

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I am strongly against this bill as Canada is facing food insecurity and out of control food price increases. There is also a lack of transparency and conflict of interest when this bill was introduced. There is plenty of other solutions that can be employed to address the housing situation.