Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

56802

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
A decision to burn more wood pellets means burning more trees for electricity – producing a fuel that’s even dirtier at the smokestack than coal. We have to stop this harmful industry in its tracks.

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

56804

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Please stop the expansion of the wood pellet industry. Cutting down tress as a climate friendly energy solution is a false solution. Burning wood pellets is as dirty and worse than burning coal. How can this be a solution? Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

56805

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Why is the government still cutting down our Forrest’s . Isn’t it enough they have screwed up almost everything they touch. Now they want to strip away all the oxygen producing Forrest’s. I always knew a politician sucked the air out of a room as soon as they enter. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

56806

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
The argument to expand the forest-biomass industry, particularly the wood pellet sector, to provide low-carbon jobs in replacement of fossil fuel jobs isn’t valid. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

56808

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Hello, I've been made aware through stands.earth that you are thinking about expanding the deforestation to profit the pellet industry. While pellet is a good thing, to valorise and make use of the wood-industry waste, it become anti-ecological if it comes from fresh trees Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

56818

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
We are in the midst of a climate emergency and this proposal is a serious mistake. It is like trying to put out a fire by throwing gasoline on it. Wood pellets are marketed as a clean energy alternative, but the fact is that wood pellets are dirtier than coal at the smokestack. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

56821

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I am extremely concerned about the possible expansion of Ontario's biomass industry. Wood pellets have been found to dirtier than coal at the smokestack, and any plan that promotes increasing deforestation as a climate solution is not viable! Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

56822

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Using white wood pellets is the exact opposite of climate solution since trees help get rid of carbon dioxide. They shouldn’t be used for this at all, trees should be left standing. This is an incredibly bad idea. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

56823

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I do not support burning wood pellets for electricity. This is a retrograde idea that will only lead to more destruction of our environment and forests, and bring more CO2 into our atmosphere, which we all know we do not need. Lire davantage