Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81817

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I am responding to Bill 23. I feel that the 30m limit from wetlands for development is too much and could hamper the building of new homes. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81822

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Re: ERO 019-2927 Proposed updates to the regulation of development for the protection of people and property from natural hazards in Ontario Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81825

Commentaire fait au nom

Sifton Properties Limited

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Please find enclosed Sifton Properties Limited’s (herein known as “Sifton”) review and comment regarding proposed changes through Bill 23, More Homes Built Faster Act, to the Conservation Authorities Act. We are, generally, in support of the proposed section 28 changes to the Conservation Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81835

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
The protection of all watercourses are extremely important. Undefined swales feed into watercourses downstream and that is what creates a defined channel. Just because a watercourse does not have a defined bank does not mean it's unimportant. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81839

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
The protection of all watercourses is imperative. Undefined swales feed into watercourses downstream and that is what creates a defined channel. Watercourse that do not have a defined banks are just as important as those that do. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81849

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Comments on ERO 019 2927 Proposed updates to the regulation of development for the protection of people and property from natural hazards in Ontario Comments as follows: Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81851

Commentaire fait au nom

Upper Thames River Conservation Authority

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
The Upper Thames River Conservation Authority (UTRCA) thanks the Province of Ontario for the opportunity to review and comment on the “Proposed updates to the regulation of development for the protection of people and property from natural hazards in Ontario.” This posting is proposing that the 36 i Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81855

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I'm no expert, but it sounds like some of these proposed 'updates' to the conservation authorities act would make it harder for the conservation authorities to oversee building activity and also allow it to be easier to build on potential riparian areas. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

81858

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Increase distance to more than 30 meters to 100 meters for prohibited development. Lire davantage