Commentaires

Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.

Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.

Télécharger les commentaires

Recherche de commentaires

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

2414

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Building "soon-to-be-obsolete' nuclear plants is short sighted. Parts of Australia are using only solar power. Things are happening very fast. Let's get ahead of the curve. Don't believe me? Watch this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xg03UUYKG1s [Original Comment ID: 210323]

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

2420

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
Think about it. Nuclear energy does provide electricity. That is all it does. What has not happened is a way to nullify the contaminants created as a by-product. Why not? You have figured out only half of the equation. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

2421

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I am a huge fan of renewable energy. Nuclear, in spite of what its proponents say, is not an alternative that should be continued. It is just too dangerous. Never mind potential melt-downs even the spent fuel is a ticking time bomb. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

2424

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I do not see the need for further promotion of nuclear energy in Ontario as the government has said that there is enough alternative energy being generated, which is why more wind energy stations are no longer needed. [Original Comment ID: 210336]

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

2428

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I am fully in support of the following statements: The Ontario government should recognize public expectations for public safety, including putting in place measures to protect the public in the event of a Fukushima-scale accident. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

2430

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
I am deeply concerned at the failure of the present government of Ontario to appropriately take into account the risks to Ontarians posed by the nuclear generation stations on the shores of the great lakes. Lire davantage

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

2431

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
NUCLEAR POWER IS TOO DANGEROUS.......TOO EXPENSIVE.......how can any reasonable, logical public servant take the risk with so many lives? Alternative power exists and should be employed.....be a hero with this generation and any future Canadians who may survive. [Original Comment ID: 210344]

Identifiant (ID) du commentaire

2432

Commentaire fait au nom

Individual

Statut du commentaire

Commentaire approuvé More about comment statuses
We have lived since 1980 in Prince Edward County, 100+ KM downwind and downstream in Lake Ontario of the Darlington Nuclear station and within 80 KM of 2 nuclear stations across the border in the USA. Lire davantage