Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.
Doubling the tonnage makes little environmental, economic or social sense. It needs to be turned
down. The environmental impacts of this license and those which it is proposed that it be
amalgamated with are already the subject of numerous Spills Line complaints.
Lire davantage
request the time period for submissions be extended to 90 days as opposed to the 30 days now given. 30 days in not adequate time for the public to study and reply to the proposals. I am opposed to the muddification of the waters around the proposed dump site.
The 30 day comment period is unreasonable and unacceptable. This is a very complex proposal with serious environmental implications. The comment period must be extended to a minimum of 90 days.
Mr. Darryl Hagman
Aggregate Technical Specialist
Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry,
Southern Region
615 John Street North,
Aylmer, ON
N5H 2S8
RE: EBR Numbers 012-9852, 012-9850, 012-9848, 012-9845, 012-9843, 012-9849
Dear Mr.
Lire davantage
It is very difficult to comment when access to information is very limited and when given such a
short time frame of 30 days.
How can one compare the current plans with the new ones? Much is at stake and the MNRF should be
ensuring that the Carmeuse is following due process.
In regard to 012-9843. In this proposed change there are no site plans shown and the present ones are not there to compare to either. It is poor planning to only give 30 days to comment especially when the case officer has not been available for most of that time to ask questions of.
I am writing in concern of the amalgamation of laws that Carmeuse can increase the tonnage they
excavate. It's concerning that in the 30 day period the case office has been grossly absent. In
the 30 days, the rest of the details have not been made available to the public.
Lire davantage
Re EBR 012-9843 Carmeuse Lime (Canada) limited, a proposal to Add rescind or vary a conditon of
licence to amalgamate Licence no 2130 and 2136 impacting the area of 3 licensed sites under the
reference of 2136
While this action is purported to result in a decrease of annual production it remai
Lire davantage
To: Darryl Hagman, Acting Aggregate Technical Specialist,
Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry
April, 2017
Re: Comments on EBR numbers: 012-9852, 012-9850, 012-9849, 012-9848, 012-9845, 012-9843 – A Lack of
information related to Site Plan Notes and Licence Conditions
I object to the ch
Lire davantage
This proposed site amalgamation reopens conditions for the rehabilitation of this area.
When you look at how other quarries are rehabilitated like St Mary’s , Innerkip, Port Colborne,
and compare it to how sparse the rehabilitation plans are for Carmeuse, we have an opportunity to
require
Lire davantage
My concerns, and questions resulting form a series of email correspondence with Mr. Hagman, (see
below) are two fold:
Mr. Hagman’s contact information is:
Darryl Hagman
A/Aggregates Technical Specialist
Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry
Aylmer, ON
615 John St. N.
Lire davantage
According to an email from Darryl Hagman of the MNRF there have been no technical studies done on
the Carmeuse sites because of “Grandfathering”.
AS A CITIZEN, IF I WISH TO UPGRADE OR CHANGE MY HOUSE WIRING, I AM REQUIRED TO BRING EVERYTHING UP
TO CODE.
Lire davantage
I was unable, like many others in my community, to make this presentation at an earlier Council
meeting, due to a technical failure of the EBR site, which frustrated many of us and prevented
even the most basic access to the limited information on the EBR.
This was confirmed by MNRF employee M
Lire davantage
I have a series of questions that I hope can be answered before a decision can be made.
- where is this new exit that is referred to in the notes but is not indicated anywhere else and
hence we do not know its’ location , so how is it possible to make comment on it ???
- Why was a letter not se
Lire davantage
IT IS IMPERATIVE THAT THE MNRF SEND A LETTER TO THE MOECC REQUESTING COMMENT BECAUSE :
The MOECC is currently under the impression and I quote:
“The Carmeuse Quarry is separate from the proposed Walker Landfill.
Lire davantage
Consulter les commentaires qu'a reçus cet avis par l'entremise du registre. Vous pouvez soit tous les télécharger, soit utiliser la fonction de recherche et de tri ci-dessous.
Certains commentaires ne seront pas affichés en ligne. Apprenez-en davantage sur l'état du commentaire et sur nos politiques relatives aux commentaires et à la protection de la vie privée.
Télécharger les commentaires
Doubling the tonnage makes…
Commentaire sur
Carmeuse Lime (Canada) Limited - Changes to the conditions of a licence to operate a pit or quarry
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
28325
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire
Related actions
request the time period for…
Commentaire sur
Carmeuse Lime (Canada) Limited - Changes to the conditions of a licence to operate a pit or quarry
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
28326
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire
request the time period for submissions be extended to 90 days as opposed to the 30 days now given. 30 days in not adequate time for the public to study and reply to the proposals. I am opposed to the muddification of the waters around the proposed dump site.
Lire davantageRelated actions
More time is necessary in…
Commentaire sur
Carmeuse Lime (Canada) Limited - Changes to the conditions of a licence to operate a pit or quarry
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
28328
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire
Related actions
The 30 day comment period is…
Commentaire sur
Carmeuse Lime (Canada) Limited - Changes to the conditions of a licence to operate a pit or quarry
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
28329
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire
The 30 day comment period is unreasonable and unacceptable. This is a very complex proposal with serious environmental implications. The comment period must be extended to a minimum of 90 days.
Related actions
Please make sure the comment…
Commentaire sur
Carmeuse Lime (Canada) Limited - Changes to the conditions of a licence to operate a pit or quarry
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
28330
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire
Related actions
Mr. Darryl Hagman Aggregate…
Commentaire sur
Carmeuse Lime (Canada) Limited - Changes to the conditions of a licence to operate a pit or quarry
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
28331
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire
Related actions
It is very difficult to…
Commentaire sur
Carmeuse Lime (Canada) Limited - Changes to the conditions of a licence to operate a pit or quarry
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
28332
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire
Related actions
In regard to 012-9843. In…
Commentaire sur
Carmeuse Lime (Canada) Limited - Changes to the conditions of a licence to operate a pit or quarry
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
28333
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire
In regard to 012-9843. In this proposed change there are no site plans shown and the present ones are not there to compare to either. It is poor planning to only give 30 days to comment especially when the case officer has not been available for most of that time to ask questions of.
Lire davantageRelated actions
I am writing in concern of…
Commentaire sur
Carmeuse Lime (Canada) Limited - Changes to the conditions of a licence to operate a pit or quarry
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
28334
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire
Related actions
Re EBR 012-9843 Carmeuse…
Commentaire sur
Carmeuse Lime (Canada) Limited - Changes to the conditions of a licence to operate a pit or quarry
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
28335
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire
Related actions
This amalgamation of these…
Commentaire sur
Carmeuse Lime (Canada) Limited - Changes to the conditions of a licence to operate a pit or quarry
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
28336
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire
Related actions
To: Darryl Hagman, Acting…
Commentaire sur
Carmeuse Lime (Canada) Limited - Changes to the conditions of a licence to operate a pit or quarry
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
28337
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire
Related actions
This proposed site…
Commentaire sur
Carmeuse Lime (Canada) Limited - Changes to the conditions of a licence to operate a pit or quarry
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
28338
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire
Related actions
My concerns, and questions…
Commentaire sur
Carmeuse Lime (Canada) Limited - Changes to the conditions of a licence to operate a pit or quarry
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
28340
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire
Related actions
According to an email from…
Commentaire sur
Carmeuse Lime (Canada) Limited - Changes to the conditions of a licence to operate a pit or quarry
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
28341
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire
Related actions
I was unable, like many…
Commentaire sur
Carmeuse Lime (Canada) Limited - Changes to the conditions of a licence to operate a pit or quarry
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
28342
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire
Related actions
I have a series of questions…
Commentaire sur
Carmeuse Lime (Canada) Limited - Changes to the conditions of a licence to operate a pit or quarry
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
28343
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire
Related actions
IT IS IMPERATIVE THAT THE…
Commentaire sur
Carmeuse Lime (Canada) Limited - Changes to the conditions of a licence to operate a pit or quarry
Identifiant (ID) du commentaire
28344
Commentaire fait au nom
Statut du commentaire
Related actions