Metrolinx - Permit for activities that will result in a significant social or economic benefit to Ontario

La traduction française de cet avis n'est pas disponible. Nous nous excusons pour le dérangement.

Type d'acte: Permit for activities that will result in a significant social or economic benefit to Ontario

Numéro du REO
019-3562
Numéro de référence du ministère
CN-D-001-21
Type d'avis
Instrument
Loi
Endangered Species Act , R.S.O. 2007
Affiché par
Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks
Étape de l'avis
Décision
Décision publiée
Période de consultation
Du 17 mai 2021 au 16 juin 2021 (30 jours) Fermé
Dernière mise à jour

Il n’existe aucune obligation d’afficher cet avis sur le Registre environnemental de l’Ontario, mais nous voulons connaître votre opinion. Nous vous remercions de vos commentaires.

Cette consultation a eu lieu :

du 17 mai 2021
au 16 juin 2021

Résumé de la décision

The Minister has issued a socio-economic benefit permit under the Endangered Species Act, 2007 to Metrolinx to improve public transit along the Barrie, Kitchener, Lakeshore East, Lakeshore West, Richmond Hill, Stouffville, Union Station and Union Pearson GO Transit Corridors. It includes actions to mitigate impacts and other key requirements.

Détails de l'emplacement

Détails de l'emplacement du site

The exact areas of impact for these transit improvements are not yet known. Larger areas, known as “Study Areas” are being considered for the final designs of the projects.

The Study Areas extend along GO Rail Corridors as follows:

  • Barrie Corridor from Parkdale Junction (off Kitchener Corridor) to Allandale Station
  • Kitchener Corridor from UP Express Spur (at Highway 427) to Bramalea
  • Lakeshore East Corridor from Don Yard Layover to Oshawa Station
  • Lakeshore West Corridor from immediately west of Bathurst Street to Burlington
  • Richmond Hill Corridor from eastern limit of Union Station Rail Corridor to approximately Mile 4.4 in the vicinity of Pottery Road
  • Stouffville Corridor from Scarborough Junction (off Lakeshore East Corridor) to Lincolnville Station
  • Union Pearson (UP) Express Corridor from UP Express Union Station to Terminal 1 at Toronto Pearson International Airport; and
  • Union Station Corridor from UP Express Union Station to Don Yard Layover

An overview map of these corridors is included with this posting.

Promoteur(s)

Metrolinx
130 Adelaide Street West
Toronto, ON
M5H 3P5
Canada

Détails de la décision

On August 20, 2020, the Minister of the Environment, Conservation and Parks issued a socio-economic benefit permit to Metrolinx to improve public transit along the Barrie, Kitchener, Lakeshore East, Lakeshore West, Richmond Hill, Stouffville, Union Station and Union Pearson GO Transit Corridors.

Currently it is not known if, or how, species at risk will be impacted by this infrastructure project. The following species may be present within the project study areas:

  • Bank Swallow
  • Barn Swallow
  • Bobolink
  • Butternut
  • Chimney Swift
  • Eastern Meadowlark
  • Eastern Small-Footed Myotis
  • Little Brown Myotis
  • Northern Myotis
  • Redside Dace
  • Silver Shiner
  • Tri-colored Bat

The permit requires Metrolinx and its project partners to complete surveys to confirm what species at risk are present before construction activities begin, while also ensuring there are measures in place to mitigate impacts to the species listed.

Significant social or economic benefit to Ontario

The OnCorr GO Transit Expansion project is expected to:

  • improve capacity and speed on several commuter corridors
  • reduce corresponding road congestion
  • improve overall mobility and quality of life for Ontarians living in and around the Barrie, Kitchener, Lakeshore East, Lakeshore West, Richmond Hill, Stouffville, Union Station and Union Pearson Express GO Transit Corridors

Electrification efforts are expected to reduce emissions from transit vehicles as well as commuter vehicular traffic by diverting commuters to public transit. This represents a significant social and economic benefit to Ontario.

Protecting species under the Endangered Species Act

Our government is committed to protecting species at risk and providing strong environmental oversight, while working to support development opportunities in the province.

Businesses, municipalities and other proponents are expected to take steps to ensure their projects avoid any adverse impacts on species at risk or their habitats. However, where avoidance is not possible, the ESA gives the Minister the discretion to authorize activities if certain conditions can be met.

The Minister of the Environment, Conservation and Parks may issue a permit under the ESA authorizing a person to engage in an activity that would otherwise be prohibited by sections 9 or 10 if the Minister is of the opinion that:

  • the main purpose of the activity authorized by the permit is not to assist in the protection or recovery of the species specified in the permit
  • the activity authorized by the permit will result in a significant social or economic benefit to Ontario
  • the activity authorized by the permit will not jeopardize the survival or recovery of the species in Ontario
  • reasonable alternatives have been considered, including alternatives that would not adversely affect the species, and the best alternative has been adopted
  • reasonable steps to minimize adverse effects on the species are required by conditions of the permit

OnCorr activities will be protective of species

The permit includes species-specific mitigation schedules that prescribe:

  • what mitigation measures must be taken to minimize adverse impacts on the species to which the schedule applies
  • what actions must be taken to replace any habitat that is removed

This framework is intended to ensure that:

  • impacts are minimized
  • there is no net loss of species at risk habitat

Given the requirements outlined in the permit, the residual impacts of the project (i.e. impacts after mitigation is applied) are not expected to jeopardize the survival or recovery of any of the 12 species included in the permit.

Reasonable alternatives have been considered

The proposed OnCorr activities include improvements to existing infrastructure (i.e. electrification of existing commuter rail corridors, track replacement/upgrades) as well as new infrastructure such as new track, switches, train storage and layover facilities as well as grade separations.

The upgrades apply to existing footprints so it was not possible for Metrolinx to consider alternate locations for those project aspects.

New infrastructure must be located alongside or adjacent to existing rail corridors and therefore, it is also not possible to consider alternate locations for those project aspects.

Since it is not possible for the project to move forward in alternate locations, the proposed permit includes conditions based on alternative means of protecting the species and avoiding adverse effects on the species and their habitat including requiring:

  • the use of exclusion methods to prevent impacts to the species
  • the protection of Butternut trees of high conservation value where possible
  • restricting specific activities during certain times of the year

Given that it is not possible to move forward with the project in alternate locations and given the species-specific mitigation measures included in the permit that require the proponent to avoid adverse impacts to the species where possible, the the best alternative that would allow the project to continue while achieving its purpose has been adopted.

Actions to minimize negative effects to the species

The permit requires Metrolinx to take actions to minimize negative effects to the species. This includes:

  • using qualified professionals with expertise in each of the species to carry out the permit
  • educating contractors on how to identify the species at risk and what steps to take should the species at risk be encountered within the study areas
  • monitoring to determine the effectiveness of these actions
  • taking additional steps if the actions are proven to be ineffective

Other information

A government response statement (GRS), which outlines protection and recovery actions the government will take and support, exists for all but two of the species in the proposed permit:

  • Chimney Swift
  • Silver Shiner

Proposed permit conditions align with actions outlined in the GRS for the species.

Commentaires reçus

Par l'entremise du registre

0

Par courriel

0

Par la poste

0
Consulter les commentaires soumis par l'entremise du registre

Effets de la consultation

No comments from public consultation were received.

Documents justificatifs

Consulter les documents en personne

Certains documents justificatifs peuvent ne pas être accessibles en ligne. Si tel est le cas, vous pouvez demander à consulter les documents en personne.

Veuillez communiquer avec le bureau mentionné ci-dessous pour savoir si les documents sont accessibles.

How to Appeal

Les appels ne sont pas autorisés

Ce type d’acte ne peut être porté en appel. En savoir plus sur notre processus de consultation.

Communiquer avec nous

Contact

Clairissa Myschowoda

Phone number
Office
Species at Risk Branch - Permissions
Address

300 Water Street
4th Floor, South tower
Peterborough, ON
K9J 3C7
Canada

S'inscrire pour obtenir des avis

Nous vous enverrons des avis par courriel accompagnés de toute mise à jour liée à cette consultation. Vous pouvez modifier vos préférences relatives à l'avis en tout temps en allant à votre page de profil où se trouvent vos paramètres.

Suivre cet avis

Proposition initiale

Numéro du REO
019-3562
Numéro de référence du ministère
CN-D-001-21
Type d'avis
Instrument
Loi
Endangered Species Act , R.S.O. 2007
Affiché par
Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks
Proposition affichée

Période de consultation

17 mai 2021 - 16 juin 2021 (30 days)

Pourquoi une consultation n’est pas nécessaire

We are not required to consult on this permit application as it relates to an animal and therefore does not meet the required criteria set out in subsection 1.3(6) of Ontario Regulation 681/94 of the Environmental Bill of Rights, 1993. We are voluntarily posting this notice to advise the public of this proposal and to invite the public to submit written comments to the contact person identified in this notice.

Détails de la proposition

Ontario is committed to protecting species at risk and strong environmental oversight, while we work to improve public transit in a way that is both economical and transparent.

Metrolinx is seeking a socio-economic permit in relation to group of activities and projects under the broader OnCorr GO Transit Expansion project that will improve public transit along the Barrie, Kitchener, Lakeshore East, Lakeshore West, Richmond Hill, Stouffville, Union Station and Union Pearson Express GO Transit corridors.

The GO Transit Expansion Program, also known as OnCorr, will involve the electrification of commuter rail corridors and associated infrastructure, installation of new track and switches, grade separation and bridge and pedestrian crossing modifications. It will include activities such as vegetation disturbance and removal, site grading, filling, excavation, stockpiling of soil or other materials, and the construction of bridges, retaining walls, rails and roads as is necessary to carry out the Project.

A number of species at risk have been observed within the study areas for the project including Barn Swallow and Chimney Swift, and there is some evidence that Species at Risk bats (i.e. Eastern Small-Footed Myotis, Little Brown Myotis, Northern Myotis and Tri-coloured Bat) occur within the study areas.

Additional species at risk (Bank Swallow, Bobolink, Butternut, Meadowlark, Redside Dace and Silver Shiner) have not yet been observed within the study areas; however, there is evidence from publicly-available species occurrence data to suggest that these species may be found within the study areas.

Collectively, these twelve species at risk are referred to as “the species” in the context of this notice.

Much of the study areas have not yet been surveyed in detail for the species at risk. The proposed permit would require surveys to confirm or refute the presence of the additional species before construction activities begin.

Protecting species under the Endangered Species Act

Sections 9 and 10 of the ESA provide protection for individual members of a species and their habitat if that species is listed on the Species at Risk in Ontario List as either:

  • extirpated
  • endangered
  • threatened

Under clause 17(2)(d) of the ESA, the Minister of the Environment, Conservation and Parks may issue a permit authorizing a person to engage in an activity that would otherwise be prohibited by sections 9 or 10 if the Minister is of the opinion that:

  • the activity authorized by the permit will result in a significant social or economic benefit to Ontario,
  • the activity authorized by the permit will not jeopardize the survival or recovery of the species in Ontario,
  • reasonable alternatives have been considered, including alternatives that would not adversely affect the species, and the best alternative that would allow the projects to continue has been adopted; and
  • reasonable steps to minimize adverse effects on the species are required by conditions of the permit.

In addition, although not required for a permit issued under clause 17(2)(d), Metrolinx is proposing to partner with local Conservation Authorities to undertake beneficial actions, such a habitat creation or enhancements, for Barn Swallow and Species at Risk Bats.

Significant Social or Economic Benefit to Ontario

The OnCorr GO Transit Expansion project is expected to result in significant social and economic benefits to Ontarians. Expansion of the transit network is expected to improve capacity and speed on commuter corridors and reduce corresponding road congestion. Electrification efforts are expected to lessen emissions from transit vehicles as well as commuter vehicular traffic by diverting commuters to public transit. The project is also aimed improving overall mobility and quality of life for Ontarians living in and around the Barrie, Kitchener, Lakeshore East, Lakeshore West, Richmond Hill, Stouffville, Union Station and Union Pearson Express GO Transit Corridors.

Reasonable alternatives being considered

Metrolinx is exploring reasonable alternatives, including those that would avoid adverse effects on the species and their habitat. Many of these alternatives will be refined in the detailed planning stages of the projects. The proposed permit will provide clear direction on species-specific avoidance measures, reasonable measures to minimize adverse effects on species, as well as mitigation and compensation requirements. In this way, should the final project layout and design result in impacts to the species and their habitat, the proposed permit would provide species-specific guidance for project planners to develop and implement designs with lower impacts on species at risk and their habitat.

Actions to minimize negative effects to the species

Metrolinx is seeking ways to minimize adverse effects on the species and their habitat. These may include:

    • Undertaking studies to confirm or refute the presence of the species prior to construction commencing;
    • Undertaking work at the time of year when the species are less sensitive to disturbance;
    • If habitat will be removed;
      • removing it at the time of year when the species are less likely to be present; and
      • creating or enhancing habitat for the species to compensate for the habitat that was removed;
    • If any members of the species will be removed (i.e. Butternut), compensating for these impacts through actions that benefit the species (e.g. plantings);
    • Providing contractors with education on how to identify the species at risk and what steps to take should the species at risk be encountered within the study areas;
    • Monitoring the effectiveness of any steps taken to minimize adverse effects on the species and taking additional steps to increase their effectiveness should they be found to be ineffective.

Other information

A government response statement, which outlines protection and recovery actions the government will take and support, exists for the following species and will be considered before a decision is made on whether to issue a permit:

A government response statement has not been published for Chimney Swift and Silver Shiner.

Posting this proposal on the Environmental Registry does not imply that we will issue a permit. A permit may only be issued where the legal requirements set out in clause 17(2)(d) of the Endangered Species Act, 2007 have been satisfied.

Commentaire

La consultation est maintenant terminée.

Cette consultation a eu lieu 17 mai 2021
au 16 juin 2021

Communiquer avec nous

Contact

Clairissa Myschowoda

Phone number
Office
Species at Risk Branch - Permissions
Address

300 Water Street
4th Floor, South tower
Peterborough, ON
K9J 3C7
Canada