HAW Limited - Permit for activities to achieve an overall benefit to a species

La traduction française de cet avis n'est pas disponible. Nous nous excusons pour le dérangement.

Type d'acte: Permit for activities to achieve an overall benefit to a species

Numéro du REO
019-3199
Numéro de référence du ministère
CN-C-003-20
Type d'avis
Instrument
Loi
Endangered Species Act , R.S.O. 2007
Affiché par
Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks
Étape de l'avis
Décision
Décision publiée
Période de consultation
Du 17 mai 2021 au 16 juin 2021 (30 jours) Fermé
Dernière mise à jour

Cette consultation a eu lieu :

du 17 mai 2021
au 16 juin 2021

Résumé de la décision

The minister has issued an overall benefit permit to HAW Limited to adversely impact 56 Category 2 Butternut trees, which are species at risk, so they can construct a residential subdivision. The permit includes actions to benefit the species, minimize adverse effects, and outlines monitoring and reporting requirements.

Détails de l'emplacement

Adresse du site

Town of Whitby, ON
Canada

Détails de l'emplacement du site

Northwest corner intersection of Taunton Road West and Country Lane in the Town of Whitby, Durham Region

Carte de l'emplacement du site

L'épingle de localisation correspond à la zone approximative où a lieu l’activité environnementale.

Afficher cet emplacement sur une carte opens link in a new window

Promoteur(s)

HAW Limited
245 Yorkland Blvd
Toronto, ON
M2J 4W9
Canada

Détails de la décision

On September 14, 2021, the Minister of the Environment, Conservation and Parks issued an overall benefit permit to HAW Limited under the Endangered Species Act, 2007 (ESA) concerning Butternut trees. The permit enables HAW Limited to construct a residential subdivision, consisting of 305 residential units, in Whitby, Ontario.

The permit authorizes HAW Limited to:

  • remove 39 Category 2 Butternut trees, the majority of which are either seedlings or saplings
  • harm 17 Category 2 Butternut trees
  • adversely impact up to 3 hectares of Butternut habitat

The main threat to the survival of Butternut trees is Butternut Canker, and this disease has affected most Butternut trees across the province.

Butternut trees are divided into 3 categories based on their health:

Category 1: in the advanced stages of disease as a result of Butternut Canker (“non-retainable”)

Category 2: the tree does not have Butternut Canker or disease is not as advanced (“retainable”)

Category 3: could be useful in determining how to prevent or resist Butternut Canker (“archivable”)

Protecting species under the Endangered Species Act

Our government is committed to protecting species at risk and providing strong environmental oversight, while working to support development opportunities in the province.

Businesses, municipalities and other proponents are expected to take steps to ensure their projects avoid any adverse impacts on species at risk or their habitats. However, where avoidance is not possible, the ESA gives the Minister the discretion to authorize activities if certain conditions can be met.

The permit includes conditions that require HAW Limited to undertake measures that will:

  • achieve an overall benefit to Butternut within a reasonable timeframe
  • minimize adverse effects to Butternut

Actions to achieve an overall benefit to species

The permit requires HAW Limited to achieve an overall benefit for Butternut within a reasonable timeframe, including:

  • planting 184 Butternut seedlings and 184 native companion seedlings to mimic natural Butternut habitat conditions
  • monitoring and tending the Butternut seedlings for at least five years

Actions to minimize adverse effects to species

The permit requires HAW Limited to carry out actions to minimize adverse effects on Butternut, including:

  • engaging a Qualified Professional to carry out the conditions of the permit
  • retaining five Butternut trees located on the project site, including the installation of protective fencing to prevent construction activities from harming the butternut and encroaching into their habitat
  • ensuring that any vegetation clearing is removed in such a way that will reduce environmental exposure (e.g. wind damage) to Butternuts that are retained on site
  • transplanting 12 Butternut at the site to an appropriate planting location

Other information

HAW Limited considered reasonable alternatives, including alternatives that would not adversely affect the species, such as:

  • not proceeding with the proposed development
  • considering a revised site layout of the proposed development that would impact less Category 2 Butternut individuals
  • proceeding with the proposed site layout of the development that will impact 56 Category 2 butternut individuals

The chosen alternative involves proceeding with the proposed site layout of the development and planting butternuts. This will achieve an overall benefit for the species by helping to increase the self-sustaining butternut population throughout Ontario.

The ministry has published government response statements under section 12.1 of the ESA with respect to Butternut.

The government response statements specify actions such as:

  • increasing the number of Butternut on the landscape
  • identifying and protecting existing habitat
  • increasing knowledge of species biology, abundance, distribution, and threats

Consideration was given to the government response statement, and these actions are supported in the permit.

A copy of the government response statement for Butternut is available at: butternut government response statement

Commentaires reçus

Par l'entremise du registre

1

Par courriel

0

Par la poste

0
Consulter les commentaires soumis par l'entremise du registre

Effets de la consultation

We received one comment, expressing concerns for the loss of Butternut and their habitat in favour of development. The proposed permit conditions were revised to retain 17 of the 56 Butternut trees that were originally proposed for removal. In addition, permit conditions include actions to achieve an overall benefit to the species.

Documents justificatifs

Consulter les documents en personne

Certains documents justificatifs peuvent ne pas être accessibles en ligne. Si tel est le cas, vous pouvez demander à consulter les documents en personne.

Veuillez communiquer avec le bureau mentionné ci-dessous pour savoir si les documents sont accessibles.

How to Appeal

Les appels ne sont pas autorisés

Ce type d’acte ne peut être porté en appel. En savoir plus sur notre processus de consultation.

Communiquer avec nous

Contact

Kathleen Buck

Phone number
Email address
Office
Permissions and Compliance Species at Risk Branch
Address

40 St. Clair Avenue West
14th Floor
Toronto, ON
M4V 1M2
Canada

Office phone number

S'inscrire pour obtenir des avis

Nous vous enverrons des avis par courriel accompagnés de toute mise à jour liée à cette consultation. Vous pouvez modifier vos préférences relatives à l'avis en tout temps en allant à votre page de profil où se trouvent vos paramètres.

Suivre cet avis

Proposition initiale

Numéro du REO
019-3199
Numéro de référence du ministère
CN-C-003-20
Type d'avis
Instrument
Loi
Endangered Species Act , R.S.O. 2007
Affiché par
Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks
Proposition affichée

Période de consultation

17 mai 2021 - 16 juin 2021 (30 days)

Détails de la proposition

HAW Limited has submitted an application for an overall benefit permit under clause 17(2)(c) of the Endangered Species Act, 2007 (ESA) for a residential subdivision development. This includes 305 residential units made up of 40 townhomes and 265 single detached homes.

The proposed activities:

  • will remove 56 Category 2 Butternut trees, the majority of which are either seedlings or saplings
  • may adversely impact 3 hectares of Butternut habitat

The main threat to the survival of Butternut trees is Butternut Canker, and this disease has affected most Butternut trees across the province.

Butternut trees are divided into 3 categories based on their health:

Category 1: in the advanced stages of disease as a result of Butternut Canker (“non-retainable”)

Category 2: the tree does not have Butternut Canker or disease is not as advanced (“retainable”)

Category 3: could be useful in determining how to prevent or resist Butternut Canker (“archivable”)

Protecting species under the Endangered Species Act

Ontario provides protections for species at risk and their habitats under the Endangered Species Act, 2007 (ESA). Sections 9 and 10 of the Act provide protection for individual members of a species and their habitat if that species is listed on the Species at Risk in Ontario list as either:

  • extirpated
  • endangered
  • threatened

Butternut is listed on the Species at Risk in Ontario list, under O. Reg. 230/08 of the ESA as endangered.

Under clause 17(2)(c) of the ESA, the Minister may issue a permit authorizing a person to engage in an activity that would otherwise be prohibited by sections 9 or 10 of the Act if the minister believes that:

  • an overall benefit to the species will be achieved within a reasonable time through the conditions of the permit
  • reasonable alternatives have been considered, including alternatives that would not negatively affect the species, and the best alternative has been adopted
  • reasonable steps to minimize negative effects on individual members of the species are required by conditions of the permit

Providing an overall benefit to a protected species under the ESA means improving circumstances for the species in Ontario. Overall benefit is:

  • more than "no net loss" or an exchange of "like for like"
  • grounded in the protection and recovery of the species at risk
  • more than mitigation measures or "replacing" what is lost

Actions to achieve an overall benefit to species

HAW Limited is working to identify proposed actions that would achieve an overall benefit for Butternut trees. These may involve:

  • planting 184 Butternut seedlings and additional native companion seedlings to emulate natural Butternut habitat conditions
  • monitoring and tending the Butternut seedlings for at least five years

These actions are expected to achieve an overall benefit to the species by increasing the overall number of Butternut planted on the landscape, while mimicking natural Butternut habitat conditions.

Reasonable alternatives being considered

HAW Limited has explored alternatives, including alternatives that would not adversely affect Butternut trees and their habitat. These include:

  • not proceeding with the proposed development
  • considering a revised site layout of the proposed development that would impact less Category 2 Butternut individuals
  • proceeding with the proposed site layout of the development that will impact 56 Category 2 butternut individuals

HAW Limited has concluded that the best alternative for carrying out the proposed project is to proceed with the proposed residential development layout because:

  • in addition to the Category 2 Butternut individuals, 325 Category 1 Butternut individuals were identified on the project site
  • there were no mature Butternut individuals that showed signs of resistance to Butternut Canker
  • resulting from primarily non-retainable (Category 1) parent trees, it is unlikely that the Category 2 Butternut located at the project site will exhibit any resistance to the Butternut Canker as they mature, and will likely deteriorate as the Canker disease progresses
  • a greater benefit to the species will likely be achieved by planting genetically resistant butternut elsewhere as part of the overall benefit plan

Actions to minimize adverse effects on the species

HAW Limited is seeking ways to minimize adverse effects on Butternut and its habitat. These may involve engaging a Qualified Professional to oversee and undertake certain aspects of the project, such as tending and monitoring of the proposed overall benefit compensation plantings.

Other information

The Province has published a government response statement under section 12.1 of the Endangered Species Act, 2007 (ESA) with respect to Butternut.

The government response statement will be considered before a decision to issue an overall benefit permit.

A copy of the government response statement for Butternut is available at: https://www.ontario.ca/page/butternut-government-response-statement

Posting this proposal on the Environmental Registry does not imply that we will issue a permit. A permit may only be issued where the legal requirements set out in clause 17(2)(c) of the ESA have been satisfied.

Documents justificatifs

Consulter les documents en personne

Certains documents justificatifs peuvent ne pas être accessibles en ligne. Si tel est le cas, vous pouvez demander à consulter les documents en personne.

Veuillez communiquer avec le bureau mentionné ci-dessous pour savoir si les documents sont accessibles.

Commentaire

La consultation est maintenant terminée.

Cette consultation a eu lieu 17 mai 2021
au 16 juin 2021

Communiquer avec nous

Contact

Kathleen Buck

Phone number
Email address
Office
Permissions and Compliance Species at Risk Branch
Address

40 St. Clair Avenue West
14th Floor
Toronto, ON
M4V 1M2
Canada

Office phone number